On 2nd February 126,515 people gathered at the Anitkabir to demonstrate against the government's attempts to revoke the ban on headscarves in universities. Although it is not on the same scale as last spring's secular demonstrations, it still shows the extent of popular feeling on this issue.

The army constantly exploits the threat of Shariat. It is little wonder that many workers feel the need to rally in defence of the state when that they are constantly told that "they are going to make this country the same as Iran". In fact they have gone on about it so much that when he was recently asked for his opinion by the press, Yaşar Büyükkanit refused to comment stating that everyone knew what the army's views were.

On the other side of the divide, and it is a huge divide, there are those who are shouting loudest about ‘freedom', and ‘democracy'. It is quite ironic in one way that the same Islamicists who after the Murderous 12th September coup were promoted by the army are now the ones screaming about a lack of democracy, and human rights.

Of course it will come as no surprise to workers to see the hypocrisy surrounding the whole affair. There is no way in which this conflict has anything at all to do with ‘democracy', or ‘human rights', or any other ‘fine' ideals. At the base of this argument is nothing more than a naked struggle for power, a struggle for power in which last November neither side showed any hesitation in risking plunging not only Turkey, but also the entire region headlong into war in Northern Iraq just in order to prove that they were more patriotic than the other.

So where do workers stand amidst all this? Which side should we support, the Army, and its defence of ‘secularism or the government and its defence of individual freedom, and human rights.

For us as communists, it is clear that this is not a struggle in the interests of the working class. It in no way addresses the urgent concerns of workers in Turkey today, the need to defend living standards from yet more encroachments. The working class has no interest in being used as a pawn by either the army, or the AKP.

For workers it is vital to look to their own interests. Issues like this are brought up to create divisions within the working class. The media constantly present us with a series of binary choices, for or against headscarves, for or against terrorism, for or against the European Union... However among these choices there is nothing that defends the interests of workers.

What we say as communists is that this is not the struggle of the working class. That is not to say that we defend the army's right to control how women dress. Of course we don't. Nor is it to say that we support the AKP government. What we do say is that this issue is not a class issue, and we have no interest in backing either army, or government in their squalid power struggle.

Devrim